Interstate Compact - Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Compact Consent Act - Grants the consent of the Congress to the Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Compact entered into by the States of Maine, Texas, and Vermont.
Motions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 305 - 117 (Roll No. 344).(consideration: CR H6522-6535)
The previous question was ordered without objection.
CONFERENCE REPORT - The House proceeded with debate on the conference report.
Mr. Schaefer, Dan brought up conference report H. Rept. 105-630 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 511.
Rule H. Res. 511 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 511 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 629. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived.
Conference report H. Rept. 105-630 filed. (text of conference report: CR H5724-5727)
Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 105-630 filed.(text of conference report: CR H5724-5727)
Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Conference held.
Conference committee actions: Conference held.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Motion to instruct Senate conferees to include the Wellstone amendments in any conference agreement agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
Senate insists on its amendment agrees to request for a conference, appoints conferees Thurmond; Hatch; Leahy. (consideration: CR S6347)
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: and House requests a conference.
The Speaker appointed conferees for consideration of the House bill and Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Bliley, Dan Schaefer, Barton, Dingell, and Hall (TX).
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and request a conference Agreed to by voice vote. (consideration: CR H3068-3074)
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the motion.
Mr. Schaefer, Dan moved that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and request a conference.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Amendment SP 2276 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
Amendment SP 2278 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
Amendment SP 2277 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
Amendment SP 2278 proposed by Senator Domenici for Senator Wellstone to Amendment SP 2276.
Amendment SP 2277 proposed by Senator Domenici for Senator Wellstone to Amendment SP 2276.
Amendment SP 2276 proposed by Senator Domenici for Senator Snowe.
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S3015-3019)
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 197.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 309 - 107 (Roll no. 497).
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 629.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Thomas W. Ewing to act as Chairman of the Committee.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 258 and Rule XXIII.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 629 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 258. (consideration: CR H8516-8537)
Rule H. Res. 258 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 258 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 629 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 112.
Reported by the Committee on Commerce. H. Rept. 105-181.
Reported by the Committee on Commerce. H. Rept. 105-181.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.
Referred to the House Committee on Commerce.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.629 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.629 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.629 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.629 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.