PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 104-25.
Congressional Research Service
Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Feb 15, 1995
Authorizes the conveyance by the Secretary of the Interior, without reimbursement, of all U.S. interest in the New London National Fish Hatchery production facility to the State of Minnesota solely for the Minnesota fishery resources management program.
People & committees
Rep. Minge, David [D-MN-2] · D–MN
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 104-25.
Became Public Law No: 104-25.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S12111)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S12111)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 176.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Chafee without amendment. With written report No. 104-132.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Chafee without amendment. With written report No. 104-132.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by voice vote.
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by voice vote.
The House adopted the amendment as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 614.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 146 and Rule XXIII.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Dave Camp to act as Chairman of the Committee.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 614 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 146. (consideration: CR H5645-5647)
Rule H. Res. 146 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 146 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 614 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 18.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 104-36.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 104-36.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.614 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.614 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.614 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.614 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.