PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.6098 / 110th Congress

PRICE of Homeland Security Act

Became Public Law No: 110-412.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Sep 29, 2008

Personnel Reimbursement for Intelligence Cooperation and Enhancement of Homeland Security Act of 2008 or PRICE of Homeland Security Act - Amends Homeland Security Act of 2002 provisions concerning the use of funds to allow recipients of grants under provisions relating to the Urban Area Security Initiative or to the State Homeland Security Grant Program to use grant funds to achieve target capabilities related to preventing, preparing for, protecting against, and responding to acts of terrorism, consistent with a state homeland security plan and relevant local, tribal, and regional homeland security plans.

Permits such aims to be met, among other ways, by paying intelligence analysts: (1) regardless of whether the analysts are current or new full-time employees or contract employees; and (2) without limitations on the period of time that an analyst can serve under awarded grants.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Reichert, David G. [R-WA-8] · R–WA

Committees

  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
  • Homeland Security Committee
9 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 110-412.

  2. Became Public Law No: 110-412.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Cleared for White House.

  8. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  9. On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection. (text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H10625)

  10. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.(text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H10625)

  11. Mr. Etheridge asked unanimous consent that the House agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H10625)

  12. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  13. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9901; text as passed Senate: CR S9901)

  14. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9901; text as passed Senate: CR S9901)

  15. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 1052.

  16. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  17. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  18. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  19. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

  20. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  21. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H7191)

  22. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H7191)

  23. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H7191-7192)

  24. At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Ms. Harman objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.

  25. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6098.

  26. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7191-7192)

  27. Ms. Harman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  28. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 478.

  29. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 110-752.

  30. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 110-752.

  31. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  32. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  33. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Unanimous Consent .

  34. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  35. Referred to the Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment.

  36. Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.

  37. Introduced in House

  38. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Jul 9, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.6098 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.6098 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.6098 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.6098 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources