PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.603 / 106th Congress

To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the application of the Act popularly known as the "Death on the High Seas Act" to aviation incidents.

See H.R.1000.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 4, 1999

Amends Federal aviation law to declare that, after enactment of this Act, the Death on the High Seas Act does not apply to aircraft or to the navigation of vessels related to those aircraft.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Sherwood, Don [R-PA-10] · R–PA

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. See H.R.1000.

    2. Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

    3. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 412 - 2 (Roll no. 32).

      House roll call 32 · Individual votes
    4. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    5. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 412 - 2 (Roll no. 32).

      House roll call 32 · Individual votes
    6. Considered as unfinished business.

    7. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of all debate on the bill H.R. 603, the Speaker pro tempore put the question on final passage. Mr. Shuster demanded the yeas and nays and the Speaker pro tempore subsequently noticed sufficient support for the demand. Further proceedings on taking the vote on final passage were postponed until later in the legislative day.

    8. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

    9. The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 603.

    10. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 603.

    11. The Speaker designated the Honorable Mark Foley to act as Chairman of the Committee.

    12. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 85 and Rule XXIII.

    13. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 603 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. After general debate, the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority to those who have printed their amendments in the Congressional Record. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment, the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with amendments as may have been adopted. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. The Chairman may postpone a recorded vote on any amendment and reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question provided that the minimum time for voting on the first shall be fifteen minutes.

    14. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 85. (consideration: CR H900-903, H913-914)

    15. Rule H. Res. 85 passed House.

    16. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 85 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 603 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. After general debate, the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority to those who have printed their amendments in the Congressional Record. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment, the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with amendments as may have been adopted. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. The Chairman may postpone a recorded vote on any amendment and reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question provided that the minimum time for voting on the first shall be fifteen minutes.

    17. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 17.

    18. Reported by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 106-32.

    19. Reported by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 106-32.

    20. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

    21. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    22. Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.

    23. Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

    24. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E137)

    25. Introduced in House

    26. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.603 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.603 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.603 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.603 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources