PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.573 / 106th Congress

To authorize the President to award a gold medal on behalf of the Congress to Rosa Parks in recognition of her contributions to the Nation.

Laid on the table. See S. 531 for further action. (consideration: CR H2178)

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 4, 1999

Authorizes the President, on behalf of the Congress, to award a gold medal to Rosa Parks, in recognition of her contributions to the Nation.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Carson, Julia [D-IN-10] · D–IN

Committees

  • Financial Services Committee
328 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Laid on the table. See S. 531 for further action. (consideration: CR H2178)

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 424 - 1 (Roll no. 92).

    House roll call 92 · Individual votes
  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 424 - 1 (Roll no. 92).

    House roll call 92 · Individual votes
  5. Considered as unfinished business.

  6. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  7. EXTENSION OF DEBATE TIME - Mr. Bachus asked unanimous consent that the debate on H.R. 573 be extended by twenty minutes with ten minutes controlled by Mr. Bachus, five minutes by Ms. Carson and five minutes by Ms. Waters. Agreed to without objection.

  8. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 573.

  9. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2150-2161, H2177-2178)

  10. Mr. Bachus moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  11. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

  12. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  13. Referred to the Subcommittee on Domestic and International Monetary Policy.

  14. Referred to the House Committee on Banking and Financial Services.

  15. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H451-452)

  16. Introduced in House

  17. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.573 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.573 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.573 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.573 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources