PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.5627 / 115th Congress

Farmers CARE Act

Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 26, 2018

Farmers Conserving Agricultural Resources through EQIP Act or the Farmers CARE Act

This bill reauthorizes and modifies the Department of Agriculture (USDA) Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). (EQIP provides financial and technical assistance for agricultural producers and land owners to implement certain conservation practices.)

The bill expands and modifies the purposes of the program. It also includes modifications that:

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

increase payments for certain land management and vegetative practices that result in highly cost-effective treatment of priority resource concerns;

prohibit payments for large confined animal feeding operations to construct an animal waste management facility or any associated waste transport or transfer device;

repeal the allocation of funding for practices relating to livestock production;

increase the allocation of funding for practices relating to improving fish and wildlife habitat;

specify an allocation of funding for producers who participate in an independent animal welfare certification program;

add payments for certain practices that promote ground and surface water conservation;

remove the payment limitation for practices related to organic production;

add payments for certain conservation practices related to antibiotic use and pasture-based production systems;

prioritize applications that address priority resource concerns identified by USDA; and

reduce the limitation on total EQIP payments.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Huffman, Jared [D-CA-2] · D–CA

Committees

  • Agriculture Committee
9 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 11, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.5627 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.5627 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.5627 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.5627 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources