PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.5571 / 110th Congress

To extend for 5 years the program relating to waiver of the foreign country residence requirement with respect to international medical graduates, and for other purposes.

Became Public Law No: 110-362.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Oct 8, 2008

(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on September 26, 2008. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Amends the Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act of 1994 to extend the J-1 visa waiver (Conrad state 30/medical services in underserved areas) program through March 6, 2009.

Increases from five to 10 the number of alien physicians under such program who may serve in state facilities that treat patients from, but that may not be located in, a medically underserved area. (Subject to the overall limit of 30 participants per state.)

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) federal programs waiving the two-year foreign residence requirement for physicians are generally designed to promote the delivery of critically needed medical services to people in the United States lacking adequate access to physician care; and (2) when determining the qualification of a location for designation as a health professional shortage area, the Secretary of Health and Human Services should consider the needs of vulnerable populations in low-income and impoverished communities, communities with high infant mortality rates, and communities exhibiting other signs of a lack of necessary physician services.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Lofgren, Zoe [D-CA-16] · D–CA

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 110-362.

  2. Became Public Law No: 110-362.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Cleared for White House.

  8. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  9. On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by voice vote. (text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H10267)

  10. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by voice vote.(text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H10267)

  11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 5571.

  12. Ms. Lofgren, Zoe moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H10266-10267)

  13. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  14. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  15. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  16. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S9573)

  17. Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  18. Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  19. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

  20. The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

  21. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  22. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR 5/19/2008 H4113)

  23. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR 5/19/2008 H4113)

  24. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4433)

  25. At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. King (IA) objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.

  26. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 5571.

  27. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4113-4115)

  28. Mr. Scott (VA) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  29. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 407.

  30. Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 110-646.

  31. Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 110-646.

  32. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  33. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  34. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote .

  35. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  36. Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law.

  37. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  38. Introduced in House

  39. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.5571 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.5571 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.5571 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.5571 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources