PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.5553 / 107th Congress

Protecting America's Savings Act of 2002

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 3, 2002

Protecting America's Savings Act of 2002 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to accelerate increases to: (1) the $5,000 deductible individual retirement account (IRA) contribution limit; and (2) the $15,000 elective deferral and the State, local, and tax-exempt organizations' plan limits, the $10,000 SIMPLE plan limit, and catch-up contribution limits.Increases dollar amount eligibility for IRA and Roth IRA deductibility.Amends Federal law to permit Federal employee Thrift Savings Fund catch-up contributions.Amends the Code to expand and make permanent the credit for elective deferrals and IRA contributions for certain individuals.Increases incrementally, from the current of age 70 1/2 to age 75 the required beginning date for distributions from qualified plans. Establishes: (1) $300,000 amounts not subject to minimum distribution requirements for defined contribution and individual retirement plans; and (2) $0 for defined benefit plans.Permits exempt trust and IRA rollovers to a spouse's retirement plan.Permits rollovers by nonspouse designated beneficiaries for the following retirement plans: (1) State and local government or tax-exempt organization deferred compensation plans; (2) employer-purchased employee annuity plans; and (3) certain tax-exempt organization or public school employee annuities.Provides for certain tax-free changes of "equal periodic payment" annuity determinations.Permits certain nonelective employer contributions to be made for qualifying employee "simple retirement accounts."Imposes a golden parachute excise tax on excessive employee remuneration paid by a corporation after bankruptcy.Provides for a study of defined contribution plan losses due to market volatility.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Portman, Rob [R-OH-2] · R–OH

Committees

  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
  • Ways and Means Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  2. Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  3. Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  4. Introduced in House

  5. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 19, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.5553 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.5553 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.5553 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.5553 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources