PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.5512 / 107th Congress

Mount Rainier National Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 2002

Received in the Senate.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 1, 2002

Mount Rainier National Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 2002 - Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain privately owned land, with the owners' consent, and transfers specified national forest lands to the Secretary's administrative jurisdiction, for inclusion in Mount Rainier National Park. Requires the Park's boundaries to be modified to include such lands.Requires the Secretary to: (1) ensure that access over the Carbon River Bridge to National Forest lands is maintained for commercial and other public use; and (2) acquire land in the vicinity of Wilkeson, Washington, to provide public information for visitors to public lands along the Carbon and Mowich Corridors.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Dunn, Jennifer [R-WA-8] · R–WA

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
6 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On passage Passed without objection.

  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.

  5. Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR 11/14/2002 H8889-8890; text of measure as introduced: CR 11/14/2002 H8889)

  6. Mr. Hansen asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.

  7. Committee on Resources discharged.

  8. Committee on Resources discharged.

  9. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation and Public Lands.

  10. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1726-1727)

  11. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

  12. Introduced in House

  13. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.5512 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.5512 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.5512 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.5512 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources