PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.5478 / 106th Congress

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire by donation suitable land to serve as the new location for the home of Alexander Hamilton, commonly known as the Hamilton Grange, and to authorize the relocation of the Hamilton Grange to the acquired land.

Became Public Law No: 106-482.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 17, 2000

Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to: (1) acquire land from the City of New York, New York, to serve as the new location for the home of Alexander Hamilton, the Hamilton Grange; and (2) relocate the Grange to such land.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Rangel, Charles B. [D-NY-15] · D–NY

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 106-482.

    2. Became Public Law No: 106-482.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S11276)

    8. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S11276)

    9. Received in the Senate, read twice.

    10. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    11. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H10574)

    12. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H10574)

    13. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H10702-10703)

    14. At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Hansen objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.

    15. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 5478.

    16. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H10574)

    17. Mr. Hansen moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    18. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.

    19. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    20. Introduced in House

    21. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.5478 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.5478 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.5478 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.5478 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources