PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.5403 / 118th Congress

CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Official summary

Version 07 · Reported to House · May 7, 2024

CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act

This bill prohibits a Federal Reserve bank from offering products or services directly to an individual, maintaining an account on behalf of an individual, or issuing a central bank digital currency (i.e., a digital dollar) directly or indirectly to an individual. Further, The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is prohibited from using a central bank digital currency to implement monetary policy or from issuing a central bank digital currency.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Emmer, Tom [R-MN-6] · R–MN

Committees

  • Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
  • Financial Services Committee
165 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On passage Passed by recorded vote: 216 - 192 (Roll no. 230).

    House roll call 230 · Individual votes
  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 216 - 192 (Roll no. 230).

    House roll call 230 · Individual votes
  5. The House adopted the amendment as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

  6. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  7. The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 5403.

  8. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Davidson amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Waters demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  9. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1243, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Davidson amendment No. 3.

  10. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Mooney amendment No. 2, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Waters demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  11. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1243, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Mooney amendment No. 2.

  12. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 1, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Waters demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  13. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1243, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 1.

  14. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 5403.

  15. The Speaker designated the Honorable Clay Higgins to act as Chairman of the Committee.

  16. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 1243 and Rule XVIII.

  17. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4763, H.R. 5403 and H.R. 192. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each bill. H.R. 4763 and H.R. 5403 are considered under a structured rule and H.R. 192 is considered under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on each bill.

  18. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1243. (consideration: H3496-3509)

  19. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1243 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4763, H.R. 5403 and H.R. 192. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each bill. H.R. 4763 and H.R. 5403 are considered under a structured rule and H.R. 192 is considered under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on each bill.

  20. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 409.

  21. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 118-493.

  22. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 118-493.

  23. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 27 - 20.

  24. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  25. Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

  26. Introduced in House

  27. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: May 27, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.5403 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.5403 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.5403 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.5403 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources