PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and Environment.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 27, 2000
Common Sense Drug Policy Act of 2000 - Title I: Major Drug Trafficking Prosecution - Prohibits commencement of a Federal prosecution for a drug offense involving an amount less than the minimum for an offense under the Controlled Substances Act or, in the case of cocaine, involving an amount less than 500 grams.Amends the Controlled Substances Act to repeal certain minimum sentencing periods for covered offenses.Title II: Protection of Women in Prisons - Amends the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 to require each State to provide to the Attorney General (AG) certain assurances that it has in effect certain policies and procedures designed to increase the protection of women in prisons and to address the victimization of women inmates.Title III: Increased Funding for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse in Federal Prison System - Requires the AG to carry out a program for the prevention and treatment of substance abuse among individuals who are in Federal penal or correctional institutions or in criminal custody, with special consideration for those within 12 months of completing their sentences.Title IV: Prosecutorial Data Collection - Requires the AG to establish a requirement, binding on each Federal prosecutor, that the race, ethnicity, and gender of each person charged with a Federal criminal offense prosecuted by the Department of Justice, and each victim thereof, be reported to the AG at each stage of the prosecution. Amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to provide an identical requirement with respect to State prosecutions.Title V: Clean Start - Amends the Controlled Substances Act to outline eligibility requirements for expungement of a covered offense.
People & committees
Rep. Waters, Maxine [D-CA-35] · D–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and Environment.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime.
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jun 3, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.5326 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.5326 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.5326 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.5326 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.