PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.5312 / 114th Congress

Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Modernization Act of 2016

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Jun 13, 2016

Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Modernization Act of 2016

(Sec. 5) This bill amends the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 to rename the National High-Performance Computing program as the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Program.

The program, in addition to its current requirements, shall:

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

promote increased understanding of the scientific principles of cyber-physical systems and improve methods available for the design, development, and operation of those that are characterized by high reliability, safety, and security;

conduct or arrange for research and development on human-computer interactions, visualization, and big data, as well as the enhancement of cybersecurity; and

create a research framework to leverage cyber-physical systems, high capacity and high speed communication networks, and large-scale data analytics to integrate city-scale information technology and physical infrastructures.

The Office of Science and Technology Policy shall encourage and monitor the efforts of agencies participating in the program to allocate the resources and management attention necessary to ensure that the strategic plan is executed effectively and that program objectives are met.

Annual reports on the implementation of the program shall, among other things, furnish:

a list of the senior steering groups and strategic plans that address research areas of emerging importance, and

a description of the workshops and other activities conducted.

Each chair of the advisory committee on networking and information technology (currently on high-performance computing) shall meet membership qualifications, and may be a member of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

Participating federal agencies, working through the National Science and Technology Council and with the assistance of the National Coordination Office (established by this bill), shall develop, and update every five years, a strategic plan for the program.

The plan shall specify near-term and long-term objectives and how the program will accomplish other specified objectives, including by:

fostering the transfer of research and development (R&D) results into new technologies and applications for the benefit of society,

encouraging and supporting mechanisms for interdisciplinary R&D in networking and information technology, and

promote cyberinfrastructure needs across federally funded large-scale research facilities that produce or will produce large amounts of data that will need to be stored, curated, and made available to the public.

(Sec. 6) The bill replaces the National Research and Education Network with a National Coordination Office, which the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall maintain, and which shall give technical and administrative support to participating federal agencies and, as appropriate, the advisory committee.

The National Coordination Office shall:

serve as the primary point of contact on federal networking and information technology activities;

through at least one workshop solicit recommendations from stakeholders during the development of each strategic plan;

conduct outreach to relevant organizations and the public in order to increase awareness of the program and its benefits, and potential opportunities for collaboration between the participating agencies and the private sector; and

promote access to and early application of the technologies, innovations, and expertise derived from program activities to agency missions and systems across the federal government and to U.S. industry.

The operation of the National Coordination Office shall be supported by funds from participating agencies.

(Sec. 7) The bill repeals the authorization for a Next Generation Internet program.

(Sec. 8) The program shall encourage participating agencies to support large-scale, long-term, interdisciplinary R&D activities in networking and information technology designed to advance the development of fundamental discoveries, and directed toward agency grand challenge mission areas with the potential for significant contributions to national economic competitiveness and other significant societal benefits.

Such R&D activities shall:

include projects based on applications selected through a competitive, merit-based process;

involve collaborations among researchers in institutions of higher education and industry, and may involve nonprofit research institutions and federal laboratories;

leverage federal investments through collaboration with related state and private sector initiatives; and

include a plan for fostering the transfer of research discoveries and the results of technology demonstration activities to industry for commercial development.

Participating agencies may give special consideration to projects that include cost-sharing from nonfederal sources.

R&D activities may be supported through existing or new interdisciplinary research centers organized to investigate basic research questions and carry out technology demonstration activities.

(Sec. 9) The National Coordination Office may conduct workshops and other activities on research areas of emerging importance, which may include grand challenge areas, to help guide program investments and strategic planning in those areas.

Workshop participants shall:

develop options for models for R&D partnerships among institutions of higher education, federal laboratories, and industry;

develop R&D options for specific issues addressed through those partnerships; and

propose guidelines for assigning intellectual property rights and for transferring research results to the private sector.

The National Coordination Office shall:

ensure that workshop participants have knowledge and expertise in the specific issue areas and represent a broad mix of relevant stakeholders; and

establish senior steering groups and develop focused strategic plans to coordinate and guide activities under the identified research areas.

(Sec. 10) The National Science Foundation, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Department of Energy, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of Education shall each engage in specified research and development activities in conjunction with the program.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. LaHood, Darin [R-IL-18] · R–IL

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
  • Science, Space, and Technology Committee
8 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 385 - 7 (Roll no. 298). (text: CR H3708-3711)

    House roll call 298 · Individual votes
  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 385 - 7 (Roll no. 298).(text: CR H3708-3711)

    House roll call 298 · Individual votes
  5. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3731-3732)

  6. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  7. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 5312.

  8. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3708-3714)

  9. Mr. LaHood moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  10. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 482.

  11. Reported by the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. H. Rept. 114-620.

  12. Reported by the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. H. Rept. 114-620.

  13. Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

  14. Introduced in House

  15. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.5312 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.5312 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.5312 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.5312 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources