Extending Government Funding and Delivering Emergency Assistance Act
Became Public Law No: 117-43.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 49 · Public Law · Sep 30, 2021
Extending Government Funding and Delivering Emergency Assistance Act
This act provides continuing FY2022 appropriations for federal agencies, provides supplemental appropriations, and extends several expiring programs and authorities.
Specifically, the act provides continuing FY2022 appropriations to federal agencies through the earlier of December 3, 2021, or the enactment of the applicable appropriations act.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Read full official summaryShow less
It is known as a continuing resolution (CR) and prevents a government shutdown that would otherwise occur if the FY2022 appropriations bills have not been enacted when FY2022 begins on October 1, 2021. The CR funds most programs and activities at the FY2021 levels with several exceptions that provide funding flexibility and additional appropriations for various programs.
In addition, the act provides supplemental appropriations to several federal agencies for activities related to natural disasters and the evacuees from Afghanistan.
The act also extends several expiring programs and authorities, including
the National Flood Insurance Program,
the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program,
the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity,
the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy,
the temporary scheduling order issued by the Drug Enforcement Administration to place fentanyl-related substances in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, and
the authority for the Department of Agriculture to waive certain requirements for the school meal programs.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 254 - 175 (Roll no. 311).
The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on the motion to agree to the Senate amendment to H.R. 5305.
Pursuant to a previous special order the House moved to agree to the Senate amendment.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate, under the order of 9/29/21, having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 65 - 35. Record Vote Number: 397.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate, under the order of 9/29/21, having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 65 - 35. Record Vote Number: 397.
Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure rendered moot in Senate.
Motion by Senator Schumer to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 5305 was not invoked (Record Vote No. 385) rendered moot in Senate.
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S6801-6810)
ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. McGovern asked unanimous consent that it be in order at any time to take from the Speaker's table the bill H.R. 5305, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention of any point of order, a motion offered by the Chair of the Committee on Appropriations or her designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment; that the Senate amendment and the motion be considered as read; that the motion be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and the ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations or their respective designees; and that the previous question be considered as ordered on the motion to adoption without intervening motion. Agreed to without objection.
Motion by Senator Schumer to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 5305 was not invoked (Record Vote No. 385) entered in Senate.
Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 50. Record Vote Number: 385. (CR S6693)
The previous question on the motion was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
Ms. Granger moved to recommit to the Committee on Appropriations. (text: CR H4593)
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 5305.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3755, H.R. 4350 and H.R. 5305. Rule provides for one hour of debate on H.R. 3755; one hour of debate on H.R. 4350, with consideration under a structured rule; and one hour of debate on H.R. 5305, with consideration under a closed rule. The rule provides that proceedings may be postponed through October 1, 2021, on measures that were the object of motions to suspend the rules on the legislative days of July 26, July 27, or September 21, 2021 and on which the yeas and nays were ordered. The rule provides that House Resolution 188, agreed to March 8, 2021, is further amended by striking "September 22, 2021" and inserting "October 27, 2021".
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 667. (consideration: CR H4577-4595)
Rule H. Res. 667 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 667 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3755, H.R. 4350 and H.R. 5305. Rule provides for one hour of debate on H.R. 3755; one hour of debate on H.R. 4350, with consideration under a structured rule; and one hour of debate on H.R. 5305, with consideration under a closed rule. The rule provides that proceedings may be postponed through October 1, 2021, on measures that were the object of motions to suspend the rules on the legislative days of July 26, July 27, or September 21, 2021 and on which the yeas and nays were ordered. The rule provides that House Resolution 188, agreed to March 8, 2021, is further amended by striking "September 22, 2021" and inserting "October 27, 2021".
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on the Budget, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on the Budget, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on the Budget, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.5305 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.5305 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.5305 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.5305 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.