PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.5294 / 115th Congress

Treating Barriers to Prosperity Act of 2018

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 15, 2018

Treating Barriers to Prosperity Act of 2018

This bill allows the Appalachian Regional Commission to support projects and activities addressing drug abuse, including opioid abuse.

Such projects and activities may include those that:

facilitate the sharing of best practices among states, counties, and other experts in the region with respect to reducing drug abuse;

initiate or expand programs designed to eliminate or reduce the harm to the workforce and economic growth of the region that results from drug abuse;

attract and retain relevant health care services, businesses, and workers; and

develop relevant infrastructure, including broadband infrastructure that supports the use of telemedicine.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Barletta, Lou [R-PA-11] · R–PA

Committees

  • Environment and Public Works Committee
  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
7 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5115-5116)

  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H5115-5116)

  5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 5294.

  6. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5115-5117)

  7. Mr. Barletta moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  8. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 583.

  9. Reported by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. H. Rept. 115-749.

  10. Reported by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. H. Rept. 115-749.

  11. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  12. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  13. Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management Discharged.

  14. Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management.

  15. Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

  16. Introduced in House

  17. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.5294 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.5294 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.5294 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.5294 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources