PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.529 / 104th Congress

To authorize the exchange of National Forest System lands in the Targhee National Forest in Idaho for non-Federal lands within the forest in Wyoming.

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 248.

Official summary

Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Feb 27, 1995

Authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to exchange specified Federal lands in the Targhee National Forest in Idaho for specified non-Federal lands within the Targhee National Forest in Wyoming.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Crapo, Mike [R-ID-2] · R–ID

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 248.

    2. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 104-175.

    3. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 104-175.

    4. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    5. Subcommittee on Forests and Public Lands. Hearings held.

    6. Referred to Subcommittee on Forests and Public Lands.

    7. Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    8. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    9. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

    10. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

    11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

    12. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3824-3825)

    13. Mr. Hansen moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    14. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 28.

    15. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 104-55.

    16. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 104-55.

    17. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    18. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    19. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    20. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    21. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    22. Executive Comment Requested from USDA.

    23. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Lands.

    24. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    25. Introduced in House

    26. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.529 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.529 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.529 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.529 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources