PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.5200 / 107th Congress

Clark County Conservation of Public Land and Natural Resources Act of 2002

Became Public Law No: 107-282.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 24, 2002

Clark County Conservation of Public Land and Natural Resources Act of 2002 - Designates specified Federal lands in Nevada as wilderness and components of the National Wilderness Preservation System. Releases, and retains from release, certain Nevada lands as wilderness study areas.Transfers from the Secretary to the: (1) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service specified land for inclusion in the Desert National Wildlife Range; and (2) National Park Service specified land for inclusion in the Lake Mead National Recreation Area.Directs the Secretary to manage the land located along the Interstate Route 15 corridor south of the Las Vegas Valley to the border between California and Nevada in accordance with the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act and provisions of this Act for multiple use purposes.Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area Act - Establishes in Nevada the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area to conserve, protect, and enhance the cultural, archaeological, natural, wilderness, scientific, geological, historical, biological, wildlife, education, and science resources of such Area.Authorizes the Clark County Department of Aviation to convey to the University of Nevada at Las Vegas certain land for the development of a technology research center.Directs the Secretary to convey specified Nevada land to: (1) the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department for use as a shooting range; (2) Henderson, Nevada, for use as a campus for Nevada State College; (3) Las Vegas, Nevada, for affordable housing; (4) Henderson for an economic development zone; (5) Clark County, Nevada, for any purpose; and (6) Henderson for conservation, public recreation, regional trails, and flood control facility purposes.Directs the Secretary to relocate a specified right-of-way corridor in Clark and Lincoln Counties, Nevada.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Gibbons, Jim [R-NV-2] · R–NV

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 107-282.

    2. Became Public Law No: 107-282.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10769-10771)

    9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10769-10771)

    10. Received in the Senate, read twice.

    11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    12. On passage Passed without objection. (text: CR H7977-7984)

    13. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.(text: CR H7977-7984)

    14. Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H7964-8009)

    15. Mr. Armey asked unanimous consent discharge the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union.

    16. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 470.

    17. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-750.

    18. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-750.

    19. Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation and Public Lands Discharged.

    20. Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans Discharged.

    21. Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health Discharged.

    22. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    23. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    24. Executive Comment Requested from Interior, USDA.

    25. Referred to the Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health.

    26. Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans.

    27. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation and Public Lands.

    28. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    29. Introduced in House

    30. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.5200 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.5200 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.5200 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.5200 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources