PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.5179 / 103rd Congress

Child Support Reform Amendments Act of 1994

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 5, 1994

Child Support Reform Amendments Act of 1994 - Amends Federal law to require a Federal agency to comply with a child support enforcement order by garnishing an employee's pay upon receipt of legal process. Amends Federal law with respect to specified retirement funds to authorize an individual owed a child support arrearage to attach such funds without the requirement of a second separate order if the relevant State provides notice and expedited hearings procedures. Conditions Federal benefits and employment to an individual who is more than three months in arrears for child support upon such individual's compliance with a plan to pay the arrearage. Instructs the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to assess the feasibility of denying Federal benefits and employment to persons with child support arrears exceeding three months. Authorizes the Secretary of State to refuse, revoke, restrict, or limit a passport with respect to a noncustodial parent who is the subject of an outstanding State arrest warrant for nonpayment of child support where the amount in controversy is at least $10,000.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large] · D–DC

Committees

  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
  • Foreign Affairs Committee
  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
  • Post Office and Civil Service Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

    2. Received in the Senate.

    3. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    4. On passage Passed without objection.

    5. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.

    6. Ms. Norton asked unanimous consent to discharge from committees and consider.

    7. Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H11297-11299)

    8. Committee on Foreign Affairs discharged.

    9. Committee on Foreign Affairs discharged.

    10. Committee on Government Operations discharged.

    11. Committee on Government Operations discharged.

    12. Committee on Post Office and Civil Service discharged.

    13. Committee on Post Office and Civil Service discharged.

    14. Referred to the Subcommittee on Legislation and National Security.

    15. Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

    16. Referred to the House Committee on Government Operations.

    17. Referred to the House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

    18. Introduced in House

    19. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.5179 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.5179 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.5179 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.5179 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources