PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 30, 1994
Requires a State that received funds from the Office of Justice Programs pursuant to the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to submit to the Federal Bureau of Investigation juvenile delinquency proceeding, photographic, and fingerprint records of a juvenile found guilty of committing an act which if committed by an adult would be an offense of murder, attempted murder, or rape. Permits such records to be used by a State only for criminal justice purposes for use in the manner applicable to adult defendants, including: (1) notification of a licensed firearm dealer about whether the individual is or is not prohibited from receiving a firearm under State or Federal law; and (2) a criminal history background check under the National Child Protection Act of 1993. Authorizes the Attorney General to prescribe other measures as may be required to carry out the purposes of this Act, including measures relating to the security, confidentiality, accuracy, use, misuse, and dissemination of information and to audits and recordkeeping.
People & committees
Rep. Reed, Jack [D-RI-2] · D–RI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jun 2, 2021. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.5152 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.5152 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.5152 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.5152 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.