PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Message on House action received in Senate and at the desk: House disagrees to Senate amendent.
Congressional Research Service
Version 44 · House disagreed to Senate amendment · Oct 7, 1994
Intrastate Tow and Wrecker Truck Transportation Technical Correction Act of 1994 - Amends Federal transportation law to declare that provisions relating to the prohibition against State regulation of price, route, or service of a motor carrier (other than an affiliate of a direct air carrier) or a private motor carrier that provides for the transportation of property shall not apply to tow trucks or wreckers that provide for-hire services. States that this Act shall cease to be in effect on January 1, 1997.
People & committees
Rep. Rahall, Nick J., II [D-WV-3] · D–WV
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Message on House action received in Senate and at the desk: House disagrees to Senate amendent.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H11414)
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H11414)
Mr. Rahall asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendment.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S14416-14417)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S14416-14417)
Amendment SP 2632 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2632 proposed by Senator Ford.
Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S14416-14417)
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 706.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection.
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H10351-10352)
Mr. Rahall asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.
Committee on Public Works + Transportation discharged.
Committee on Public Works + Transportation discharged.
Referred to the House Committee on Public Works + Transportation.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.5123 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.5123 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.5123 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.5123 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.