PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.5107 / 106th Congress

Work Made for Hire and Copyright Corrections Act of 2000

Became Public Law No: 106-379.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 6, 2000

Work Made For Hire and Copyright Corrections Act of 2000 - Amends Federal copyright provisions to remove sound recordings from the list of works covered by the definition of "work made for hire." Makes such amendment effective as of November 29, 1999 (the enactment date of the provision that included sound recordings in such definition).Makes technical amendments to copyright recordkeeping provisions.Revises Copyright Office fee provisions.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Coble, Howard [R-NC-6] · R–NC

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
14 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 106-379.

  2. Became Public Law No: 106-379.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10498-10499)

  9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10498-10499)

  10. Received in the Senate, read twice.

  11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  12. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H7771-7772)

  13. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H7771-7772)

  14. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 5107.

  15. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7771-7774)

  16. Mr. Coble moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  17. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 517.

  18. Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 106-861.

  19. Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 106-861.

  20. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  21. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  22. Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property Discharged.

  23. Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property.

  24. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  25. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H7244)

  26. Introduced in House

  27. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.5107 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.5107 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.5107 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.5107 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources