PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.5030 / 103rd Congress

International Narcotics Control Corrections Act of 1994

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Oct 7, 1994

International Narcotics Control Corrections Act of 1994 - Amends the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to redefine a "major illicit drug producing country" as a country in which 1,000 hectares or more of illicit opium poppy or coca is cultivated or harvested annually or 5,000 hectares or more of illicit cannabis is cultivated or harvested annually unless the President determines that such cannabis production does not significantly affect the United States. Provides for advance notification to the appropriate congressional committees of any transfer by the Government to a foreign country, for narcotics control purposes, of property or funds seized or forfeited in connection with narcotics-related activities. Reallocates foreign assistance (currently, security assistance) withheld from countries that fail to take adequate steps to halt illicit drug production or trafficking. Extends certain international narcotics control strategy reporting requirements and annual certification procedures for FY 1993 and 1994 through FY 1995. Makes such requirements and procedures currently applicable after September 30, 1994, effective after September 30, 1995 (the beginning of FY 1996). Repeals specified international narcotics control Acts. Exempts specified narcotics control-related transfers of excess defense articles, foreign military financing, and international military education and training from a prohibition on assistance to foreign law enforcement agencies. Waives all restrictions on assistance (except for countries that are "decertified" under narcotics control certification provisions) with respect to narcotics-related assistance provided during FY 1995 if the President notifies the appropriate congressional committees in advance. Authorizes the President to furnish assistance to any country or international organization during FY 1995 for the prevention and suppression of international criminal activities. Exempts such assistance from the prohibition on assistance to foreign law enforcement agencies. Requires the President to take steps to ensure that the immediate relatives of any individual involved in drug trafficking are not permitted entry into the United States consistent with the Immigration and Nationality Act. NATO Participation Act of 1994 - Authorizes the President to establish a program to assist the transition to full North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) membership of Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and other designated Partnership for Peace countries. Permits the President, in carrying out such program, to provide excess defense articles, international military education and training, and foreign military financing assistance to such countries.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Hamilton, Lee H. [D-IN-9] · D–IN

Committees

  • Foreign Affairs Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    2. Passed Senate with amendments by Voice Vote.

    3. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Voice Vote.

    4. Amendment SP 2640 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.

    5. Amendment SP 2640 proposed by Senator Breaux for Senator Kerry.

    6. Amendment SP 2639 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.

    7. Amendment SP 2639 proposed by Senator Simpson for Senator Brown.

    8. Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S14666-14667)

    9. Received in the Senate, read twice.

    10. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    11. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

    12. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

    13. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

    14. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9173-9175)

    15. Mr. Hamilton moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    16. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 401.

    17. Reported by the Committee on Foreign Affairs. H. Rept. 103-724.

    18. Reported by the Committee on Foreign Affairs. H. Rept. 103-724.

    19. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

    20. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    21. Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

    22. Introduced in House

    23. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.5030 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.5030 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.5030 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.5030 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources