PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 24, 2002
Professional Boxing Amendments Act of 2002 - Amends the Professional Boxing Safety Act of 1996 to: (1) require an Indian tribe to establish a boxing commission to regulate professional boxing matches (matches) held on its reservation; (2) prohibit a person from arranging, promoting, or fighting in a match in a State (current law) or Indian land unless the match is approved by the United States Boxing Administration (USBA) (established under this Act) and supervised by a boxing commission that is a member of the Association of Boxing Commissions; (3) require each promoter who intends to hold a match in a State that does not have a boxing commission to notify the USBA and the supervising boxing commission at least 14 days prior to such match that all applicable requirements of this Act will be met; (4) require pre-fight boxer physical examinations to include testing for infectious diseases and to require the presence of an ambulance and emergency medical personnel with appropriate resuscitation equipment during any fight; (5) include Indian tribes, when appropriate, within boxing registration requirements; (6) require (current law urges) a boxing commission to make a health and safety disclosure to a boxer when issuing an identification card; (7) require the USBA (currently the Association of Boxing Commissioners) to develop guidelines for boxing contract requirements and for rating professional boxers; (8) require the sanctioning organization for a match and its promoter to provide certain disclosures within seven days after a match of ten rounds or more; (9) repeal certain confidentiality provisions; and (10) require all judges used in matches to be USBA-licensed.Directs the USBA to establish and maintain a medical registry of comprehensive medical records and medical suspensions for every licensed boxer.Establishes the United States Boxing Administration to protect the health, safety, and general interests of boxers. Requires the USBA to maintain a national registry of boxing personnel. Authorizes the USBA to suspend or revoke boxer licenses or registrations, as appropriate.
People & committees
Rep. King, Peter T. [R-NY-3] · R–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Chairman.
Referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Mar 23, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.5006 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.5006 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.5006 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.5006 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.