PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 107-541, Part I.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 21, 2002
Amends title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act (SSA) to: (1) eliminate the 15 percent reduction in payment rates under the prospective payment system for home health services; and (2) modify payment adjustments, changing to a calendar year update, and increasing payments.Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to: (1) establish and appoint an OASIS Task Force to examine the data collection and reporting requirements under the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) required under the Balanced Budget Act of 1997; and (2) review the standards used, by fiscal intermediaries in paying for home health services under Medicare, in allowing infrequent or short duration absences from the home for individuals eligible to receive such services.Amends SSA title XVIII to extend the update limitation on certain high cost programs.Prescribes a formula for the redistribution of unused full-time equivalent resident positions in the fields of allopathic and osteopathic medicine for a hospital with respect to the determination of direct graduate medical education costs.Requires the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MEDPAC) to examine the budget consequences of its recommendations before making them.Directs the Secretary to establish demonstration projects for: (1) disease management for certain Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes; and (2) medical adult day care services.
People & committees
Rep. Tauzin, W. J. (Billy) [R-LA-3] · R–LA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 107-541, Part I.
Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 107-541, Part I.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.4987 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.4987 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.4987 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.4987 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.