PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Aug 12, 2025
Grocery Reform And Safety Act or the GRAS Act
This bill imposes premarket review requirements on certain new substances intended for use in food and requires the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to periodically reassess the safety of existing substances used in food. Under current law, substances added to food generally must be approved by the FDA before use. However, substances that are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by qualified experts are exempt from premarket review. Manufacturers may, but are not required to, notify the FDA when they determine a substance is GRAS.
Under the bill, a new substance (or a new use of an existing substance) may not be treated as GRAS and used in food until the FDA is notified of the determination that the substance is GRAS and issues a written statement that it does not object to that determination. The notification must detail the conditions under which the substance has been determined to be GRAS and must include specified supporting information, including evidence that the substance is not toxic or carcinogenic. The FDA must seek public comment on GRAS notifications and must act on notifications within a specified period.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Further, the FDA must regularly reassess the safety of certain substances used in food, including substances considered GRAS before the bill's enactment, and may require the submission of safety information for substances being reassessed.
Finally, the bill establishes fees for initial FDA review of substances used in food and for safety reassessments.
People & committees
Rep. Pallone, Frank [D-NJ-6] · D–NJ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Oct 29, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.4958 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.4958 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.4958 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.4958 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.