PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 441.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 13, 2002
Retirement Savings Security Act of 2002 - Makes the sunset provisions in Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 inapplicable to the pension and individual retirement provisions in Title VI of that Act, which are thus made permanent.
People & committees
Rep. Portman, Rob [R-OH-2] · R–OH
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 441.
Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 308 - 70 (Roll no. 248). (text: CR H3789)
House roll call 248 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 308 - 70 (Roll no. 248).(text: CR H3789)
House roll call 248 · Individual votesOn motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 186 - 192 (Roll no. 247). (text: CR H3809)
House roll call 247 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House proceeded with ten minutes of debate on Mr. Neal's motion to recommit with instructions.
Mr. Neal moved to recommit with instructions to Ways and Means. (consideration: CR H3809-3811)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 451, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Neal amendment.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 4931.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4931 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 451. (consideration: CR H3789-3812)
Rule H. Res. 451 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 451 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4931 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 19, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.4931 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.4931 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.4931 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.4931 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.