PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 12, 2016
ATF Enforcement Act
This bill amends the federal judicial code to require the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) to be appointed by the Attorney General. Currently, the Director is appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.
Additionally, it amends several appropriations laws to remove limitations on the ATF's authority to conduct activities related to the administration of federal firearms laws.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
The amended appropriations laws include:
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016;
the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013;
the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012;
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010;
the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009;
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008;
the Science, State, Justice, Commerce, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006;
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005; and
the Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003.
The bill removes provisions from these laws that:
prohibit the consolidation or centralization within the Department of Justice of firearm transfer records maintained by federal firearms licensees;
prohibit the imposition of a requirement that firearms dealers conduct a physical inventory;
require instant background check records to be destroyed within 24 hours;
limit the use of firearms tracing data;
limit the processing of Freedom of Information Act requests in connection with arson or explosive incidents or firearm traces;
limit denials of applications to import "curios or relics" firearms, parts, or ammunition;
prohibit denials of federal firearms licenses due to lack of business activity;
prohibit the transfer of functions, missions, or activities to other agencies or departments;
prohibit the search of electronic firearm transfer records of federally licensed gun dealers who go out of business; and
prohibit denials of applications to import certain non-sporting shotguns.
People & committees
Rep. Beyer, Donald S., Jr. [D-VA-8] · D–VA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 12, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.4905 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.4905 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.4905 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.4905 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.