PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.4865 / 115th Congress

Crop Insurance Modernization Act of 2018

Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities and Risk Management.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 19, 2018

Crop Insurance Modernization Act of 2018

This bill modifies the federal crop insurance program to expand subsidies for beginning farmers, establish a conservation practice-based pilot program, and revise conservation requirements.

The bill amends the Federal Crop Insurance Act to:

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

allow farmers with up to 10 years (currently 5 years) of experience to receive the beginning farmer premium subsidy discount;

require the Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation Service or an expert on the relationship between conservation activities, farm production, and risk to serve on the Federal Crop Insurance Board as a nonvoting ex officio member;

require the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation to assemble data to understand the impact of soil type, soil quality, and conservation practices on risk rating;

modify the requirements for terminating cover crops;

establish an ombudsman to assist producers who are appealing claim denials;

require a paperwork reduction policy for operations with less than $1 million in revenue; and

establish a conservation practice-based pilot program to provide premium subsidies to farmers who are in high loss counties and commit to certain conservation activities.

The bill amends the Food Security Act of 1985 to:

modify requirements for spot checks for compliance with conservation requirements;

modify the conservation requirements related to modifications of gullies; and

prohibit a producer's actual production records from one parcel of land from being used to establish actual production history on a separate parcel of land.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Nolan, Richard M. [D-MN-8] · D–MN

Committees

  • Agriculture Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities and Risk Management.

    2. Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

    3. Introduced in House

    4. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Aug 11, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.4865 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.4865 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.4865 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.4865 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources