PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.486 / 103rd Congress

To provide for the addition of the Truman Farm Home to the Harry S. Truman National Historic Site in the State of Missouri.

Became Public Law No: 103-184.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Nov 23, 1993

Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire the Truman Farm Home in Grandview, Jackson County, Missouri, to add to the Harry S. Truman National Historic Site. Directs the Secretary to provide appropriate political subdivisions of Missouri with technical and planning assistance for the development and implementation of plans, programs, regulations, or other means for minimizing the adverse effects on the Truman Farm House of the development and use of adjacent lands.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Wheat, Alan [D-MO-5] · D–MO

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 103-184.

    2. Became Public Law No: 103-184.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    8. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S17225)

    9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S17225)

    10. Received in the Senate, read twice.

    11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    12. On passage Passed without objection.

    13. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.

    14. Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR 11/22/93 H10918-10921)

    15. Mr. Vento asked unanimous consent to discharge the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union and consider.

    16. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 223.

    17. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-399.

    18. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-399.

    19. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 17.

    20. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    21. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    22. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    23. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.

    24. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    25. Introduced in House

    26. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.486 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.486 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.486 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.486 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources