To authorize the exchange of land between the Secretary of the Interior and the Director of Central Intelligence at the George Washington Memorial Parkway in McLean, Virginia, and for other purposes.
Became Public Law No: 106-412.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 12, 2000
Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior and the Director of Central Intelligence to exchange specified land within the boundary of the George Washington Memorial Parkway for specified land under the jurisdiction of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) adjacent to the boundary of the Parkway.Requires the Director to allow access to the property transferred from the National Park Service (NPS) and conveyed by the Secretary to the CIA to the public, to personnel of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center as provided for in the FHWA's report of excess, dated May 20, 1971, and to other Federal employees and visitors whose admission to the Research Center is authorized by such Center.Allows the CIA to have the right to close off such transferred property to all persons except the U.S. Park Police, other necessary NPS personnel, and personnel of the Research Center to protect CIA personnel, facilities, or property.Requires the Director to ensure compliance by the CIA with the deed restrictions for the transferred land.Requires compliance by the NPS and the CIA with the terms and conditions of the Interagency Agreement between the NPS and the CIA regarding the exchange and management of the lands discussed in that Agreement.Requires that the land conveyed: (1) to the Secretary be included within the boundary of the Parkway and be administered by the NPS as part of the Parkway; and (2) to the CIA be administered as part of its headquarters building compound.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10838)
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10838)
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H8153)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H8153)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 4835.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H8153-8154)
Mr. Hansen moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-895, Part I.
Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-895, Part I.
Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Executive Comment Requested from Interior.
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.
Referred to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.4835 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.4835 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.4835 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.4835 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.