PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Labor-Management Relations.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 26, 1994
Family Health Care Coverage Act - Requires health plans that provide a family class of enrollment to offer and provide equal coverage to any child of an eligible individual who is less than 27 years of age, has never been married, has no dependents, and has a parent-child relationship with such individual.
People & committees
Rep. Baker, Bill [R-CA-10] · R–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Labor-Management Relations.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Consumer Protection and Competitiveness.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic and Commercial Law.
Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1561-1562)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jun 3, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.4829 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.4829 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.4829 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.4829 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.