Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Amendments of 1994

Referred to the Subcommittee on Native American Affairs.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 19, 1994

Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Amendments of 1994 - Amends the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to include manufacturing and assembly of gaming devices within the definition of "class III gaming." Defines "Compact" as the class III gaming regulatory regime. Directs the Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission (Commission) to consult with an affected tribe before taking action authorized by such Act. Authorizes the Commission to monitor class III gaming where a Compact so provides. Authorizes class II tribal gaming ordinances to regulate non-Indian gaming activities on Indian lands to the same level as class III regulations permit. Sets forth Compact provisions. Applies the Federal tax exemption given to State gaming activities to Indian gaming activities. Applies Federal laws to class III gaming activities.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Torres, Esteban Edward [D-CA-34] · D–CA

Committees

Natural Resources Committee

2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Jul 28, 1994
Referred to the Subcommittee on Native American Affairs.
Jul 19, 1994
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Jul 19, 1994
Introduced in House
Jul 19, 1994
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Jul 19, 1994 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 1028 · To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and for other purposes.

Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.4787 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.4787, 103rd Congress: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Amendments of 1994

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/4787

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1994-07-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr4787/BILLS-103hr4787ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-26T13:51:38Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.4787 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.4787 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.4787, 103rd Congress: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Amendments of 1994

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/4787

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1994-07-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr4787/BILLS-103hr4787ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-26T13:51:38Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.4787 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.4787 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.4787, 103rd Congress: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Amendments of 1994

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/4787

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1994-07-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr4787/BILLS-103hr4787ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-26T13:51:38Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.4787 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.4787 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.4787, 103rd Congress: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Amendments of 1994

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/4787

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1994-07-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr4787/BILLS-103hr4787ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-26T13:51:38Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.4787 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.