PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.4763 / 118th Congress

Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Official summary

Version 07 · Reported to House · May 6, 2024

Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act

This bill establishes a regulatory framework for digital assets.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) must regulate a digital asset as a commodity if the blockchain, or digital ledger, on which it runs is functional and decentralized. The bill classifies a blockchain as decentralized if, among other requirements, no person has unilateral authority to control the blockchain or its usage, and no issuer or affiliated person has control of 20% or more of the digital asset or the voting power of the digital asset. In addition, the bill provides the CFTC with exclusive regulatory authority over cash or spot markets for digital commodities.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) must regulate a digital asset as a security if its associated blockchain is functional but not decentralized. However, the bill establishes certain exceptions to SEC regulation for digital assets that limit annual sales, restrict nonaccredited investor access, and satisfy disclosure and compliance requirements. The bill also sets forth requirements for primary and secondary market transactions.

The CFTC and SEC must jointly issue rules to define terms and exempt dually registered exchanges from duplicative rules.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Thompson, Glenn [R-PA-15] · R–PA

Committees

  • Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
  • Financial Services Committee
  • Agriculture Committee
11 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On passage Passed by recorded vote: 279 - 136 (Roll no. 226). (text: CR H3432-3455)

    House roll call 226 · Individual votes
  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 279 - 136 (Roll no. 226). (text: CR H3432-3455)

    House roll call 226 · Individual votes
  5. The House adopted the amendments en gros as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

  6. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  7. The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 4763.

  8. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Perry amendment No. 4, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes prevailed. Ms. Waters demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  9. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1243, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 4.

  10. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Norman amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes prevailed. Ms. Waters demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  11. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1243, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Norman amendment No. 3.

  12. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1243, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Pettersen amendment No. 2.

  13. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Casar amendment No. 1, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes prevailed. Mr. Casar demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  14. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1243, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Casar amendment No. 1.

  15. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 4763.

  16. The Speaker designated the Honorable Michael Guest to act as Chairman of the Committee.

  17. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 1243 and Rule XVIII.

  18. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4763, H.R. 5403 and H.R. 192. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each bill. H.R. 4763 and H.R. 5403 are considered under a structured rule and H.R. 192 is considered under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on each bill.

  19. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1243. (consideration: H3419–3463)

  20. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1243 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4763, H.R. 5403 and H.R. 192. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each bill. H.R. 4763 and H.R. 5403 are considered under a structured rule and H.R. 192 is considered under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on each bill.

  21. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 401.

  22. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 118-484, Part II.

  23. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 118-484, Part II.

  24. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 118-484, Part I.

  25. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 118-484, Part I.

  26. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  27. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  28. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 35 - 15.

  29. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  30. Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  31. Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  32. Introduced in House

  33. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: May 27, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.4763 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.4763 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.4763 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.4763 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources