To amend the Zuni Land Conservation Act of 1990 to provide for the expenditure of Zuni funds by that tribe.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 15, 2000.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Oct 19, 2000
Title I: Expenditure of Funds by Zuni Tribe - Amends the Zuni Land Conservation Act of 1990 to: (1) establish the Zuni Indian Tribe as the trustee of the Zuni Indian Resource Development Trust Fund (currently, the trustee is the Secretary of the Interior); and (2) eliminate the cost limitation with respect to the expenditure of the corpus of the Trust Fund.Title II: Establishment of Native Nations Institute for Leadership, Management, and Policy - Establishes at the Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy at the University of Arizona the Native Nations Institute for Leadership, Management, and Policy to promote leadership and management training and policy analysis for Native Americans, Alaska Natives, and others involved in tribal leadership and management.Directs the Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence in National Environmental Policy Foundation to award grants to the Center to provide startup funding for the Institute (conditioned on a 25 percent match from other sources). Requires the Foundation's Board of Trustees to approve the annual budget of the Institute.Authorizes appropriations.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 15, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 7, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 5, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 14, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 4, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 3, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 2, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 1, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 31, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 30, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 29, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 28, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 27, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 26, 2000.
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 24, 2000.
Referred sequentially to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce for a period ending not later than Oct. 23, 2000 for consideration of such provisions of the bill and amendments as fall within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to clause 1(g), rule X.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-993, Part I.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-993, Part I.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Executive Comment Requested from Interior.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1082-1083)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jul 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.4725 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.4725 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.4725 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.4725 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.