Making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.
Became Public Law No: 103-334.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 24, 1994
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Fiscal Year 1995 Appropriations Title II: Fiscal Year 1994 Supplemental District of Columbia Funds Title I: Fiscal Year 1995 Appropriations - District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 1995 - Appropriates funds to the District of Columbia for FY 1995 for: (1) the Federal payment to the District of Columbia; and (2) the Federal contribution to retirement funds. Appropriates specified sums out of the District of Columbia general fund for the current fiscal year for: (1) governmental direction and support; (2) economic development and regulation; (3) human resources development; (4) public safety and justice; (5) public education; (6) human support services; (7) public works; (8) the Washington Convention Center Fund; (9) repayments of specified loans and interest; (10) repayment of the general fund deficit; (11) short-term borrowing; (12) employees' optical and dental benefits; (13) employees' pay adjustments; (14) the D.C. General Hospital deficit payment; (15) the Rainy Day Fund; (16) job-producing economic development incentives; (17) the Cash Reserve Fund; (18) capital outlay; (19) the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund; (20) the Lottery and Charitable Games Enterprise Fund; (21) the Cable Television Enterprise Fund; and (22) the Starplex Fund. Requires the District of Columbia Mayor to reduce appropriations and expenditures for personal and nonpersonal services by a specified amount. (Sec.101) Sets forth certain uses of and restrictions on the expenditure of appropriations made by this Act. (Sec. 110) Requires that the annual budget for the District of Columbia government for FY 1996 be transmitted to the Congress by April 15, 1995. (Sec. 123) Directs the Mayor to submit to the D.C. Council, within 30 days after the end of the first quarter of FY 1995, the FY 1995 revenue estimates. (Sec. 132) Requires each agency, office, and instrumentality of the District to implement a hiring freeze, to fill only vacancies in essential positions, and to fill essential positions from among employees holding non-essential positions. Prohibits a non-essential position that becomes vacant, other than by termination for cause, from being filled. Requires the Council of the District to enact legislation to implement this Act. (Sec. 133) Prohibits funds in this Act from being used to: (1) provide for salaries, expenses, or other costs associated with the offices of U.S. Senator or Representative under the District of Columbia Statehood Constitutional Convention Initiatives Act of 1979; or (2) perform abortions except when it is made known to the entity or official to which funds are appropriated under this Act that such procedure is necessary to save the life of the mother or that the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. (Sec. 135) Requires the District of Columbia Retirement Board to enter into an agreement with an independent firm that meets specified requirements to prepare and submit to the Board a written set of findings and recommendations regarding the appropriateness and adequacy of its fiduciary, management, and investment practices and procedures. Requires the Board to report to the Congress on such findings and recommendations. (Sec. 135) Requires the Mayor, within 15 days after the end of every calendar quarter (beginning in FY 1995), to report to specified congressional committees on the financial and budgetary status of the District of Columbia government for the previous quarter. Title II: Fiscal Year 1994 District of Columbia Funds - District of Columbia Supplemental Appropriations and Rescissions Act, 1994 - Makes supplemental appropriations (including rescissions) to the District of Columbia for FY 1994 for: (1) governmental direction and support; (2) economic development and regulation; (3) human resources development; (4) public safety and justice; (5) public education; (6) human support services; (7) repayment of the general fund recovery debt; (8) severance pay; (9) short-term borrowing; and (10) the Lottery and Charitable Games Enterprise Fund. Transfers to the General Fund of the District of Columbia specified amounts from the Cable Television Enterprise Fund and the Starplex Fund. Rescinds specified FY 1994 funds earmarked for: (1) public works; (2) the Washington Convention Center Fund; (3) repayment of loans and interests; (4) employee optical and dental benefits; (5) the D.C. General Hospital deficit payment; (6) the Cash Reserve Fund; and (7) the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund.
Senate agreed to House amendment to Senate amendments numbered 3, 6, 12, 15, 18, 20, 21 and 23 by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S13774-13776, S13796-13802)
Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to House amendment to Senate amendments numbered 3, 6, 12, 15, 18, 20, 21 and 23 by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S13774-13776, S13796-13802)
SP 2599 fell when SP 2594 withdrawn.
Proposed amendment SP 2602 withdrawn in Senate.
Proposed amendment SP 2585 withdrawn in Senate.
Proposed amendment SP 2594 withdrawn in Senate.
Amendment SP 2602 proposed by Senator Durenberger.
Proposed amendment SP 2601 withdrawn in Senate.
Amendment SP 2601 proposed by Senator Metzenbaum.
House amendment to Senate amendments considered in Senate.
SP 2597 fell when SP 2596 ruled out of order.
SP 2596 ruled out of order by the chair.
Motion to waive the Budget Act with respect to SP 2596 rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 58-41. Record Vote No: 313.
Conference report considered in Senate. (consideration: CR S13082)
Conference papers: Senate report and managers' statement and message on House action held at the desk in Senate.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 23 Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H7166)
Motions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 23 Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H7166)
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 21 Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H7166-7168)
Mr. Dixon moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 23.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 21 Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H7166-7168)
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 20 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Dixon moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 21.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 20 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 18 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Dixon moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 20.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 18 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 15 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Dixon moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 18.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 15 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 12 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Dixon moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 15.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 12 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur in the Senate amendment No. 11 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Dixon moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 12.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur in the Senate amendment No. 11 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 6 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Dixon moved that the House recede and concur in the Senate amendment No. 11.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 6 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 3 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Dixon moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 6.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 3 Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by voice vote. (consideration: CR H7166)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Dixon moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 3.
Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by voice vote.(consideration: CR H7166)
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the order of the House of Friday, August 5, 1994, the House considered the conference report and proceeded with on hour of debate.
Mr. Dixon brought up conference report H. Rept. 103-671 by previously agreed to special order.
Mr. Dixon asked unanimous consent That it be in order on August 8, 1994, or any day thereafter, to consider the conference report to H.R. 4649, and that the amendments in disagreement, motions to dispose of amendments in disagreement, and motions printed in the joint explanatory statement of the committee of conference to dispose of amendments in disagreement be considered as read when called up for consideration. Agreed to without objection.
Conference report H. Rept. 103-671 filed with 9 amendments in disagreement. Filed late, pursuant to previous special order. (text of conference report: CR H6883-6887)
Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 103-671 filed with 9 amendments in disagreement. Filed late, pursuant to previous special order.(text of conference report: CR H6883-6887)
Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Mr. Obey asked unanimous consent that managers on the part of the House have until midnight on Aug. 4 to file a conference report on H.R. 4649. Agreed to without objection.
The Speaker appointed conferees: Dixon, Stokes, Durbin, Kaptur, Skaggs, Pelosi, Obey, Walsh, Istook, Bonilla, and McDade.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House instruct conferees Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 316 - 101 (Roll no. 358). (consideration: CR H6388-6392)
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Walsh motion to instruct conferees. The instructions contained in the motion require the managers on the part of the House to insist on the House provision which directs the District of Columbia government to cut its FY 1995 spending by $150 million.
Mr. Walsh moved that the House instruct conferees.
On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H6388)
Mr. Dixon asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and agree to a conference.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate insists on its amendments asks for a conference, appoints conferees Kohl; Murray; Feinstein; Byrd; Burns; Mack; Hatfield. (consideration: CR S9346)
Passed Senate with amendments by Yea-Nay Vote. 68-32. Record Vote No: 217. (consideration: CR S9345-9346)
The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
The previous question was ordered without objection.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 4649.
On motion to rise and report Agreed to by voice vote.
Mr. Dixon moved for the Committee of the Whole to rise and report.
LIMITATION ON DEBATE TIME - By unanimous consent, debate on the Barton amendment and all amendments thereto was limited for not to exceed 30 minutes, equally divided and controlled.
On motion to rise and report Failed by recorded vote: 192 - 236 (Roll no. 320).
Mr. Dixon moved for the Committee of the Whole to rise and report.
GENERAL DEBATE - Pursuant to the unanimous consent request previously agreed to, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Kweisi Mfume to act as Chairman of the Committee.
On motion to resolve into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union Agreed to by voice vote.
Pending the foregoing motion, Mr. Dixon asked unanimous consent that the time for general debate on the bill be limited to not more than one hour, equally divided. Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Dixon moved to resolve into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H5589-5612)
Rule H. Res. 466 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 466 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of HR4649 to. Waiving all points of order against consideration of the bill. During consideration of the bill, all points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XI shall be waived.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 312.
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-558, by Mr. Dixon.
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-558, by Mr. Dixon.
Ordered to be Reported.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Introduced in House
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee.
Final Day of Subcommittee Mark-up.
First Day of Subcommittee Mark-up.
Final Day of Subcommittee Hearings.
First Day of Subcommittee Hearings.
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Referred to the Subcommittee on District of Columbia.
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.4649 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.4649 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.4649 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.4649 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.