PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.4609 / 115th Congress

West Fork Fire Station Act of 2017

By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 115-316.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Dec 11, 2017

West Fork Fire Station Act of 2017

This bill directs the Department of Agriculture, on receiving a request from Dolores County in Colorado, to convey to the county, without consideration, approximately 3.61 acres of National Forest System land in the county to be used for a fire station, related infrastructure, and roads to facilitate access to and through such land.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Tipton, Scott R. [R-CO-3] · R–CO

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 115-316.

    2. By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 115-316.

    3. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 543.

    4. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski without amendment. Without written report.

    5. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski without amendment. Without written report.

    6. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    7. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    8. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    9. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3321)

    10. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H3321)

    11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 4609.

    12. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3321-3322)

    13. Mr. McClintock moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    14. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 477.

    15. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-624.

    16. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-624.

    17. Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

    18. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    19. Subcommittee on Federal Lands Discharged.

    20. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    21. Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.

    22. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    23. Introduced in House

    24. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.4609 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.4609 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.4609 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.4609 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources