Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1995
Became Public Law No: 103-317.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 36 · Passed House amended · Jun 28, 1994
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Department of Justice and Related Agencies Title II: Department of Commerce Title III: The Judiciary Title IV: Related Agencies Title V: Department of State and Related Agencies Title VI: General Provisions Title VII: Fiscal Year 1994 Supplemental Appropriations Title VIII: Additional General Provisions Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1995 - Title I: Department of Justice and Related Agencies - Department of Justice and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1995 - Makes FY 1995 appropriations to the Department of Justice. (Sec. 103) Prohibits the use of funds to require any person to perform, or facilitate the performance of, any abortion. Makes appropriations for the following related agencies for FY 1995: (1) the Commission on Civil Rights; (2) the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; (3) the Federal Communications Commission; (4) the Federal Maritime Commission; (5) the Federal Trade Commission; (6) the Securities and Exchange Commission; and (7) the State Justice Institute. Title II: Department of Commerce - Makes FY 1995 appropriations to the Department of Commerce and related agencies. Title III: The Judiciary - Judiciary Appropriations Act, 1995 - Appropriates FY 1995 funds for activities of the Judiciary, including: (1) the Supreme Court; (2) the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; (3) the U.S. Court of International Trade; (4) the Court of Appeals, district courts, and judicial services; (5) the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; (6) the Federal Judicial Center; and (7) the U.S. Sentencing Commission. Title IV: Related Agencies - Appropriates FY 1995 funds for: (1) the Maritime Administration of the Department of Transportation; (2) the Commission on Immigration Reform; (3) the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe; (4) the Competitiveness Policy Council; (5) the Marine Mammal Commission; (6) the Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal Holiday Commission; (7) the Office of the United States Trade Representative; (8) the Small Business Administration; and (9) the Legal Services Corporation. Title V: Department of State and Related Agencies - Department of State and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1995 - Appropriates FY 1995 funds for the Department of State. Appropriates FY 1995 funds for: (1) the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency; (2) the Commission for the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad; (3) the International Trade Commission; (4) the Japan-United States Friendship Commission; and (5) the United States Information Agency. Title VI: General Provisions - Sets forth limitations and prohibitions on the use of funds appropriated by this Act. (Sec. 606) Prohibits the use of funds for the construction, repair, overhaul, conversion, or modernization of vessels for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in shipyards located outside of the United States. Prohibits such activities on aircraft for NOAA in facilities located outside the United States and Canada. (Sec. 607) Expresses the sense of the Congress that equipment and products purchased under this Act should be American-made. Title VII: Fiscal Year 1994 Supplemental Appropriations - Makes emergency supplemental appropriations to the Small Business Administration and the Department of Transportation. Makes supplemental appropriations to the Department of State. Title VIII: Additional General Provisions - Prohibits funding for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to implement, administer, or enforce certain proposed guidelines that pertain to religious harassment in the workplace.
Motions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 322 - 98 (Roll no. 408).(consideration: CR H8634)
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report.
Mr. Mollohan brought up conference report H. Rept. 103-708 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 523.
Rule H. Res. 523 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 523 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 4603. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
Conference report H. Rept. 103-708 filed. Filed late, pursuant to previous special order. (text of conference report: CR H8468-8503)
Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 103-708 filed. Filed late, pursuant to previous special order.(text of conference report: CR H8468-8503)
Mr. Hoyer asked unanimous consent that managers on the part of the House have until midnight on Aug. 16 to file a conference report on H.R. 4603. Agreed to without objection.
Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.
The Speaker appointed conferees: Mollohan, Smith (IA), Carr, Moran, Skaggs, Price (NC), Obey, Rogers, Kolbe, Taylor (NC), and McDade.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 177 - 250 (Roll no. 384). (consideration: CR H7307-7310)
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Rogers motion to instruct conferees. The instructions contained in the motion require the managers on the part of the House to agree to the Senate amendments numbered 125 and 127. These amendments provide for reductions in the U.S. contribution levels to International Organizations from $913,941,000 to $873,222,000 and for reductions in U.S. contributions to International Peacekeeping from $533,304,000 to $500,000,000.
Mr. Rogers moved that the House instruct conferees.
On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H7307)
Mr. Mollohan asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and agree to a conference.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate insists on its amendments asks for a conference, appoints conferees Hollings; Byrd; Inouye; Bumpers; Lautenberg; Sasser; Kerrey; Domenici; Stevens; Hatfield; McConnell; Cochran; Gramm. (consideration: CR S9559)
Passed Senate with amendments by Voice Vote.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Voice Vote.
Proposed amendment SP 2381 withdrawn in Senate.
Amendment SP 2381 proposed by Senator Hollings for Senator Brown.
Amendment SP 2380 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2380 proposed by Senator Hollings.
Amendment SP 2379 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2379 proposed by Senator Domenici for Senator Hutchison.
Amendment SP 2378 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2378 proposed by Senator Domenici for Senator Brown.
Amendment SP 2377 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2377 proposed by Senator Domenici for Senator Brown.
Amendment SP 2376 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2376 proposed by Senator Domenici for Senator Brown.
Amendment SP 2375 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2375 proposed by Senator Domenici for Senator Craig.
Amendment SP 2374 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2374 proposed by Senator Domenici for Senator Pressler.
Amendment SP 2373 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2373 proposed by Senator Domenici for Senator Pressler.
Amendment SP 2372 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2372 proposed by Senator Hollings.
Amendment SP 2371 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2371 proposed by Senator Hollings for Senator Dodd.
Amendment SP 2370 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2370 proposed by Senator Hollings for Senator Levin.
Amendment SP 2368 not agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2369 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 33-54. Record Vote No: 227.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Lightfoot motion.
Mr. Lightfoot moved to recommit with instructions to Appropriations.
The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
The previous question was ordered without objection.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 4603.
On motion to rise and report Agreed to by voice vote.
Mr. Mollohan moved for the Committee of the Whole to rise and report.
DEBATE - By unanimous consent, all debate on the Taylor (NC) amendment was limited for not to exceed 40 minutes, equally divided and controlled.
DEBATE - By unanimous consent all further debate on the Rogers amendment and all amendments thereto, was limited for not to exceed 30 minutes, equally divided and controlled.
The Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Condit amendment.
Mr. Mollohan asked unanimous consent that the time for further debate on the Condit amendment, all amendments thereto, be limited to not to exceed 20 minutes, equally divided. Agreed to without objection.
DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Hefley amendment.
DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of debate on the Porter amendment and the Berman amendment thereto (if offered).
POSTPONED VOTE - Pursuant to a previous unanimous consent agreement, further proceedings on the Inslee amendment were postponed until the completion of Title V.
DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Inslee amendment.
POSTPONED VOTE - Pursuant to a previous unanimous consent agreement, further proceedings on the Stearns amendment were postponed until the completion of Title V.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Considered as unfinished business.
Mr. Mollohan asked unanimous consent that during the further consideration of the bill, the chairman of the Committee of the Whole may postpone until a later time during consideration a request for a recorded vote on any amendment to title 5 of the bill, and reduce to not less than five minutes the time for voting on any postponed question that immediately follows another vote, provided that the time for voting on the first in any series of questions shall be not less that 15 minutes. Agreed to without objection.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 4603 as unfinished business.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5159-5168)
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 4603 as unfinished business.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Penny amendment.
Mr. Mollohan asked unanimous consent that the time for debate on the Penny amendment, and all amendments thereto, be limited to not to exceed ten minutes. Agreed to without objection.
DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 15 minutes of debate on the Burton amendment.
DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Burton amendment.
Mr. Dingell raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Dingell stated that the proviso beginning on line 25, page 48 and extending through line 4 on page 49 contains language which imposes duties outside the scope of existing law. The Chair sustained the point of order.
DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Goodlatte amendment.
DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Penny amendment.
On motion to resolve into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union Agreed to by voice vote.
Mr. Mollohan moved to resolve into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5094-5159)
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 4603 as unfinished business.
On motion to rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Mr. Mollohan moved to rise.
STATEMENT BY CHAIRMAN OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - When the Committee of the Whole rose, the amendment offered by Mr. Fields (TX) had failed on a recorded vote on which the votes cast by the Delegates and the Resident Commissioner were decisive. That result was reaffirmed by the House. Accordingly, the Fields amendment was not agreed to.
Under the rule, the question on agreeing to the amendment offered by Mr. Fields must be put de novo before the full House.
RE-VOTE ON COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AMENDMENT - As Chairman the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union Mr. Brown (CA), pursuant to clause 2(d) of rule XXIII, reported to the House that during consideration of the bill H.R. 4603 in the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, the votes cast by the Delegates and the Resident Commissioner were decisive on a recorded vote on the amendment offered by Mr. Fields (TX).
Mr. Fields (TX) raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Fields stated that the provisions of the bill relating to the increase and allocation of Security and Exchange Commission fees, constituted an appropriation of unauthorized funds. The Chair sustained the point of order.
On motion to resolve into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union Agreed to by voice vote.
Mr. Mollohan moved to resolve into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4963-4990)
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 4603 as unfinished business.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Considered as unfinished business.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 4603 as unfinished business.
Pursuant to the unanimous consent request just agreed to, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.
The Speaker designated the Honorable George E. Brown Jr. to act as Chairman of the Committee.
On motion to resolve into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union Agreed to by voice vote.
Pending the foregoing motion, Mr. Mollohan asked unanimous consent that the time for general debate on the bill be limited to one hour, equally divided. Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Mollohan moved to resolve into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H4923-4936)
Rule H. Res. 461 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 461 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4603. Specified points of order against the bill shall be waived. Where points of order are waived against only part of a paragraph, any point of order against matter in the balance of the paragraph may be applied only within the balance of the paragraph and not against the entire paragraph. Bill is open to amendments. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall have precedence over a motion that the Committee of the Whole rise and report the bill to the House, if the amendment is offered by a Member designated in the report.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 306.
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-552, by Mr. Mollohan.
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-552, by Mr. Mollohan.
POINTS OF ORDER RESERVED - Mr. Rogers of Kentucky reserved all points of order against H.R. 4603.
Introduced in House
Ordered to be Reported.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee.
Final Day of Subcommittee Mark-up.
First Day of Subcommittee Mark-up.
Final Day of Subcommittee Hearings.
First Day of Subcommittee Hearings.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, State, and Judiciary.
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.4603 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.4603 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.4603 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.4603 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.