Referred to the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions Supervision, Regulation and Deposit Insurance.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 6, 1993
Financial Services Act of 1993 - Amends the Revised Statutes of the United States to permit national banks to engage in mutual fund dealing, underwriting, distribution, and sponsorship, if such activities are conducted through nonbank subsidiaries. Amends the Federal Reserve Act to set forth certain disclosure requirements for nonbank subsidiaries of State or national member banks engaged in mutual fund activities, including a one-time written disclosure to each customer that neither the subsidiary nor its investment products are insured. Amends the Banking Act of 1933 (Glass-Steagall Act) to permit: (1) a member bank, including a national bank, to be affiliated with a company engaged in investment company activities; and (2) management interlocks between either a member bank, or a bank holding company, and their respective affiliates engaged in investment company activities. (Current law proscribes such interlocks.) Amends the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 to permit a bank holding company to acquire investment company securities. (Current law prohibits such acquisition.) Sets forth one-time disclosure requirements regarding such acquisitions which reflect the disclosure requirements applicable to national and State banks under this Act.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.458 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.458 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.458 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.458 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.