PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.4516 / 108th Congress

Department of Energy High-End Computing Revitalization Act of 2004

Became Public Law No: 108-423.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Nov 30, 2004

(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on October 10, 2004. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Department of Energy High-End Computing Revitalization Act of 2004 - (Sec. 3) Directs the Secretary of Energy to: (1) implement a research and development program (involving software and hardware development) to advance high-end computing systems; and (2) develop and deploy them for advanced scientific and engineering applications.

Details program functions, including research in: (1) multiple architectures, which may include vector, reconfigurable logic, streaming, processor-in-memory, and multithreading architectures; and (2) software development on optimal algorithms, programming environments, tools, languages, and operating systems for high-end computing systems, in collaboration with architecture development efforts.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Directs the Secretary to establish and operate facilities to: (1) conduct advanced scientific and engineering research and development using Leadership Systems; (2) develop potential advancements in high-end computing system hardware and software; and (3) provide access to such Systems on a competitive, merit-reviewed basis to researchers in U.S. industry, institutions of higher education, national laboratories, and other Federal agencies.

Directs the Secretary to: (1) establish at least one High-End Software Development Center which shall concentrate efforts to develop, test, maintain, and support optimal algorithms, programming environments, tools, languages, and operating systems for high-end computing systems; and (2) use the expertise of a Center to assess research and development in high-end computing system architecture.

(Sec. 4) Authorizes appropriations for FY 2005 through 2007.

(Sec. 5) Amends the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 to make the Department of Energy, along with the National Science Foundation and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (as under existing law), one of three specified Federal agencies jointly establishing the Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee.

Revises Advisory Committee membership to include three members selected by the Secretary of Energy.

(Sec. 6) Amends the the Metric Conversion Act of 1975 and the Savings in Construction Act of 1996 to repeal the expiration date of (thereby making permanent) Federal agency authority to require metric system specifications (subject to certain conditions for specifications that can only be satisfied by hard-metric versions) for concrete masonry units and recessed lighting fixtures in a solicitation for design or construction of a Federal facility within the United States or its territories.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Biggert, Judy [R-IL-13] · R–IL

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Science, Space, and Technology Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 108-423.

  2. Became Public Law No: 108-423.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by voice vote.

  9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by voice vote.

  10. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 4516.

  11. Mrs. Biggert moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H9868-9869; text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H9868)

  12. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  13. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  14. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  15. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S11127-11183; text: CR S11180-11182)

  16. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 738.

  17. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Domenici with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 108-379.

  18. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Domenici with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 108-379.

  19. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  20. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  21. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  22. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5208)

  23. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H5208)

  24. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 4516.

  25. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5208-5209)

  26. Mrs. Biggert moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  27. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 342.

  28. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science. H. Rept. 108-578.

  29. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science. H. Rept. 108-578.

  30. Mr. Boehlert asked unanimous consent that the Committee on Science, Space and Technology have until 4:00 p.m. on July 2 to file a report on H.R. 4516. Agreed to without objection.

  31. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  32. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  33. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

  34. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  35. Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.

  36. Referred to the House Committee on Science.

  37. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1052-1053)

  38. Introduced in House

  39. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.4516 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.4516 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.4516 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.4516 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources