PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.4485 / 105th Congress

Indian Trust Fund Judicial Procedure Act

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1581)

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Aug 6, 1998

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Establishment of the Temporary Court for Tribal Trust Fund Restitution Title II: Expedited Procedure for Tribal Trust Fund Restitution Indian Trust Fund Judicial Procedure Act - Title I: Establishment of the Temporary Court for Tribal Trust Fund Restitution - Establishes the Temporary Court for Tribal Trust Fund Restitution to resolve all matters involving the management by the United States, in its capacity as legal trustee, of moneys belonging to Indian tribes. Directs the Court to: (1) decide which economic model(s) shall be used to estimate U.S. liability for breach of trust responsibility to Indian tribes in the management of tribal trust assets (phase I); and (2) apply such model(s) to determine U.S. liability to each tribe choosing to participate in such proceedings (phase II). Requires the appointment of a special master with expertise in trust law, Indian law, and the application of alternative economic models. (Sec. 106) Requires all Indian tribes that have had funds managed by the United States to be a party to the phase I proceedings, with each to be represented by their own attorney. Directs the Special Master to prepare and submit to the Court a set of economic models for estimating amounts lost as a result of U.S. breach of its trust responsibilities. (Sec. 107) Directs the Special Master, within 45 days after the completion of phase I proceedings, to initiate negotiations between each plaintiff tribe and the United States to seek agreement on the application of such economic model(s) and to produce an estimate of U.S. liability to such tribe. Allows such negotiations to continue for up to 18 months after which, if there is no resolution, the Special Master shall submit to the Court recommendations for the amount of such liability. Requires payment to each tribe within 60 days of a final decision by the Court. Extinguishes all such claims by a tribe upon acceptance of such payment. Allows any such tribe to opt out of such proceedings by submitting a motion, accompanied by a tribal resolution to such effect, to the Court. Allows any such tribe to negotiate directly with the Secretary of the Interior and through mediation procedures provided in title II of this Act or through litigation under established legal proceedings for bringing claims against the United States. (Sec. 112) Directs the Secretary to: (1) make all records involving the management of tribal trust funds available to the appropriate tribe; and (2) compensate each tribe for known errors that resulted in losses or underpayments to that tribe's trust fund account. (Sec. 115) Requires all tribal payments to be made from the Permanent Judgment Claims Fund (the Fund). Title II: Expedited Procedure for Tribal Trust Fund Restitution - Authorizes a tribe, by tribal resolution, to select the following procedures for resolving U.S. liability in the management of tribal trust lands: (1) direct negotiations with the Secretary (with a one-year time limit on achieving a settlement); or (2) mediation or arbitration, for a tribe that has opted out of title I procedures or has failed to negotiate a settlement with the Secretary within the prescribed period. (Sec. 203) Requires payment within 60 days after a settlement agreement is reached. Extinguishes all such claims by a tribe upon acceptance of such payment. Requires all tribal payments to be made from the Fund.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Miller, George [D-CA-7] · D–CA

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1581)

    2. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    3. Introduced in House

    4. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.4485 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.4485 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.4485 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.4485 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources