PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.4482 / 114th Congress

Southwest Border Security Threat Assessment Act of 2016

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Apr 13, 2016

Southwest Border Security Threat Assessment Act of 2016

(Sec. 2) This bill directs the Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS) to submit a southwest border threat analysis that includes an assessment of:

terrorism and criminal threats posed by individuals and organized groups seeking to unlawfully enter the United States through the southwest border or seeking to exploit security vulnerabilities along such border;

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

improvements needed at and between ports of entry to prevent terrorists and instruments of terror from entering the United States;

gaps in law, policy, and coordination that hinder effective and efficient border security, counterterrorism, anti-human smuggling and trafficking efforts;

the flow of legitimate trade along the southwest border;

the current percentage of situational awareness and of operational control achieved by DHS along the southwest border;

the impact of trusted traveler programs on border wait times and border security; and

traveler crossing times and any potential security vulnerability associated with prolonged wait times.

As part of such analysis, the Secretary shall consider and examine:

technology, personnel, and infrastructure needs and challenges;

the roles and authorities of law enforcement;

the status of coordination among law enforcement entities;

the terrain, population density, and climate along the southwest border; and

international agreements between the United States and Mexico.

(Sec. 3) The bill requires the Chief of the Border Patrol, within 180 days after submission of the threat analysis and every five years thereafter, to issue a Border Patrol Strategic Plan that includes consideration of:

the southwest border threat analysis;

efforts to analyze and disseminate border security and border threat information between DHS components and with other federal agencies with missions associated with the border;

efforts to increase situational awareness, to detect and prevent terrorists and instruments of terrorism from entering the United States, and to detect, interdict, and disrupt aliens and illicit drugs at the earliest possible point upon entry into the United States;

efforts to focus intelligence collection to disrupt transnational criminal organizations outside of U.S. borders;

efforts to ensure that any new border security technology can be operationally integrated with existing DHS technologies;

technology required to maintain, support, and enhance security and facilitate trade at ports of entry;

operational coordination unity of effort initiatives of DHS border security components;

lessons learned from Operation Jumpstart and Operation Phalanx;

cooperative agreements and information sharing with agencies that have jurisdiction on the borders;

border security information received from consultation with such agencies and from border community stakeholders;

staffing requirements;

a prioritized list of departmental research and development objectives;

an assessment of training programs for detecting fraudulent documents, understanding the scope of enforcement authorities and the use of force policies, and screening, identifying, and addressing vulnerable populations; and

an assessment of how border security operations affect crossing times.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. McSally, Martha [R-AZ-2] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
  • Homeland Security Committee
11 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1663-1664)

  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H1663-1664)

  5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 4482.

  6. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1663-1665)

  7. Ms. McSally moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  8. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 374.

  9. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 114-492.

  10. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 114-492.

  11. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  12. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  13. Referred to the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security.

  14. Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.

  15. Introduced in House

  16. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.4482 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.4482 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.4482 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.4482 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources