PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Select Education and Civil Rights.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 19, 1994
Workforce Diversity Partnership Act of 1994 - Establishes a workforce diversity grant program. Authorizes the Secretary of Labor to make such grants for various research, education, and training activities relating to workforce and cultural diversity. Makes eligible for such grants partnerships of an institution of higher education with one or more of the following organizations: (1) a for-profit or nonprofit corporation, business, or partnership; (2) a labor organization; or (3) an organization with demonstrated interest or expertise in workforce diversity issues. Sets forth requirements for applications, uses of funds, selection criteria, peer review panels, Federal and non-Federal shares, and reports. Authorizes appropriations.
People & committees
Rep. Owens, Major R. [D-NY-11] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Select Education and Civil Rights.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education and Training.
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E995)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.4461 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.4461 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.4461 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.4461 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.