Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1995 - Appropriates funds for FY 1995 for military construction functions administered by the Department of Defense (DOD) in specified amounts for: (1) military construction for the Army, Navy, and Air Force; (2) military construction, DOD (including a transfer of funds); (3) military construction for the Army and Air National Guards; (4) military construction for the Army, Navy, and Air Force Reserves (with a transfer of funds for the Army Reserve); (5) North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Infrastructure; (6) family housing for the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force; (7) family housing, DOD; and (8) the Base Realignment and Closure Accounts, Parts I through III (including a transfer of funds). (Sec. 101) Specifies authorized uses and prohibited uses of funds appropriated by this Act, including a prohibition on the use of funds for military construction in the U.S. territories and possessions to award a contract exceeding $1 million to a foreign contractor. (Sec. 113) Directs the Secretary of Defense to provide certain congressional advance notification of the plans and scope of any proposed military exercise involving U.S. personnel if construction amounts for such exercise are expected to exceed $100,000. (Sec. 114) Provides for the transfer of certain funds from the Military Family Housing Management Account to the appropriations for family housing. (Sec. 119) Provides for the transfer of lapsed unobligated military construction and family housing funds into the Foreign Currency Fluctuations, Construction, Defense account. (Sec. 120) Directs the Secretary to report to the Congress on actions proposed by DOD to encourage other member nations of NATO, Japan, and Korea to assume a greater share of the common defense burden of such nations and the United States. (Sec. 121) Authorizes a specified transfer of funds from the DOD Base Closure Account. (Sec. 122) Includes damage from the 1993 Guam earthquake within authorized uses of FY 1993 appropriations for family housing, Navy and Marine Corps. (Sec. 123) Cancels a specified amount of funding for DOD's military construction and family housing accounts during FY 1995. Directs the Secretary to allocate such amounts for procurement and procurement-related expenses. (Sec. 124) Appropriates funds to DOD to defray expenses for the consolidation of Coast Guard functions in Martinsburg, West Virginia. (Sec. 125) Rescinds specified funds provided in prior-year military construction appropriations Acts. (Sec. 126) Authorizes the Secretary of the Navy to convey to Seattle, Washington, all rights and interest to the Naval Reserve Center in Seattle. Requires a suitable replacement for the Center. (Sec. 127) Directs the Secretary of the Army to transfer to the Department of the Interior the Army Research Laboratory facility in Woodbridge, Virginia. (Sec. 128) Specifies conditions that should be met before the Senate considers the appropriation of funds for a military construction project which is not authorized or included in the annual budget request of DOD.
Conference papers: Senate report and managers' statement and message on House action held at the desk in Senate.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 32 Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H6532-6533)
Motions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 32 Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H6532-6533)
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 31 Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H6532)
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 32.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 31 Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H6532)
On motion that the House insist on its disagreement to the Senate amendment No. 29 Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H6533)
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 31.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House insist on its disagreement to the Senate amendment No. 29 Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H6533)
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 27 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Hefner moved that the House insist on its disagreement to the Senate amendment No. 29.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 27 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 24 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 27.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 24 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 23 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 24.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 23 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 20 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 23.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 20 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 19 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 20.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 19 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 16 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 19.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 16 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 15 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 16.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 15 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur in the Senate amendment No. 14 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 15.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur in the Senate amendment No. 14 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 13 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur in the Senate amendment No. 14.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 13 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 10 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 13.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 10 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur in the Senate amendment No. 8 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 10.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur in the Senate amendment No. 8 Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 6 Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur in the Senate amendment No. 8.
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House recede and concur with amendment in the Senate amendment No. 6 Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by voice vote.
Mr. Hefner moved that the House recede and concur with an amendment in the Senate amendment No. 6.
Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by voice vote.
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on teh conference report.
Mr. Hefner brought up conference report H. Rept. 103-624 for consideration as a privileged matter. (consideration: CR H6531)
Conference report H. Rept. 103-624 filed with 15 amendments in disagreement. Filed late, pursuant to previous special order. (text of conference report: CR H6351-6379)
Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 103-624 filed with 15 amendments in disagreement. Filed late, pursuant to previous special order.(text of conference report: CR H6351-6379)
Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.
Ms. Kaptur asked unanimous consent that managers on the part of the House have until midnight on July 27 to file a conference report on H.R. 4453. Agreed to without objection.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
The Speaker appointed conferees: Hefner, Foglietta, Meek, Dicks, Dixon, Fazio, Hoyer, Coleman, Obey, Vucanovich, Callahan, Bentley, Hobson, and McDade.
On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H6210)
Mr. Hefner asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and agree to a conference.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate insists on its amendments asks for a conference, appoints conferees Sasser; Inouye; Reid; Kohl; Byrd; Gorton; Stevens; McConnell; Hatfield.
Passed Senate with amendments by Yea-Nay Vote. 84-2. Record Vote No: 205.
The previous question was ordered without objection.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 4453.
On motion to rise and report Agreed to by voice vote.
Mr. Hefner moved for the Committee of the Whole to rise and report.
GENERAL DEBATE - Pursuant to the previous agreement of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Benjamin L. Cardin to act as Chairman of the Committee.
On motion to resolve into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union Agreed to without objection.
Pending the foregoing motion, Mr. Hefner asked unanimous consent that the time for general debate on the bill be limited to not to exceed one hour, equally divided. Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Hefner moved to resolve into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H3899-3903)
Rule H. Res. 433 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 433 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4453. During consideration of the bill, all points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are waived.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 285.
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-516, by Mr. Hefner.
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-516, by Mr. Hefner.
Ordered to be Reported.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Introduced in House
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee.
First Day of Subcommittee Mark-up.
Final Day of Subcommittee Mark-up.
Final Day of Subcommittee Hearings.
First Day of Subcommittee Hearings.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Construction.
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.4453 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.4453 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.4453 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.4453 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.