PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.4446 / 106th Congress

To ensure that the Secretary of Energy may continue to exercise certain authorities under the Price-Anderson Act through the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environment, Safety, and Health.

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 445.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 15, 2000

Amends the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (the Price-Anderson Act) to authorize the Secretary of Energy to exercise through the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environment, Safety, and Health specified authorities regarding civil monetary penalties for violation of Department of Energy safety regulations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Barton, Joe [R-TX-6] · R–TX

Committees

  • Armed Services Committee
  • Energy and Commerce Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 445.

  2. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Armed Services. H. Rept. 106-694, Part II.

  3. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Armed Services. H. Rept. 106-694, Part II.

  4. Referred sequentially to the House Committee on Armed Services for a period ending not later than July 21, 2000 for consideration of such provisions of the bill as fall within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to clause 1(c), rule X.

  5. Reported by the Committee on Commerce. H. Rept. 106-694, Part I.

  6. Reported by the Committee on Commerce. H. Rept. 106-694, Part I.

  7. Referred sequentially to the Committee on Armed Services for a period ending not later than July 21, 2000..

  8. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  9. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  10. Referred to the House Committee on Commerce.

  11. Introduced in House

  12. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Jun 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.4446 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.4446 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.4446 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.4446 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources