To ensure that the Secretary of Energy may continue to exercise certain authorities under the Price-Anderson Act through the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environment, Safety, and Health.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 445.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 15, 2000
Amends the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (the Price-Anderson Act) to authorize the Secretary of Energy to exercise through the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environment, Safety, and Health specified authorities regarding civil monetary penalties for violation of Department of Energy safety regulations.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Armed Services. H. Rept. 106-694, Part II.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Armed Services. H. Rept. 106-694, Part II.
Referred sequentially to the House Committee on Armed Services for a period ending not later than July 21, 2000 for consideration of such provisions of the bill as fall within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to clause 1(c), rule X.
Reported by the Committee on Commerce. H. Rept. 106-694, Part I.
Reported by the Committee on Commerce. H. Rept. 106-694, Part I.
Referred sequentially to the Committee on Armed Services for a period ending not later than July 21, 2000..
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on Commerce.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jun 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.4446 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.4446 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.4446 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.4446 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.