PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.4404 / 106th Congress

To permit the payment of medical expenses incurred by the United States Park Police in the performance of duty to be made directly by the National Park Service, to allow for waiver and indemnification in mutual law enforcement agreements between the National Park Service and a State or political subdivision when required by State law, and for other purposes.

Became Public Law No: 106-437.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Oct 17, 2000

Amends the Policemen and Firemen's Retirement and Disability Act to: (1) permit the payment of medical expenses incurred by a member of the U.S. Park Police in the performance of duty to be made directly by the National Park Service if the expenses are certified by the Chief, U.S. Park Police; and (2) authorize appropriations to reimburse the National Park Service for such payments.Provides indemnification for States and political subdivisions from claims by third parties for property damage or personal injury arising from activities outside of their respective jurisdictions under an agreement for cooperation with law enforcement personnel of the National Park System (including special policemen designated from other Federal, State, or local government agencies).

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Hansen, James V. [R-UT-1] · R–UT

Committees

  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 106-437.

    2. Became Public Law No: 106-437.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S11181)

    9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S11181)

    10. Received in the Senate, read twice.

    11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    12. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H9959)

    13. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H9959)

    14. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 4404.

    15. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9959-9960)

    16. Mr. Calvert moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    17. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 509.

    18. Committee on Government Reform discharged.

    19. Committee on Government Reform discharged.

    20. House Committee on Government Reform Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Sept. 14, 2000.

    21. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-854, Part I.

    22. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-854, Part I.

    23. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

    24. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    25. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    26. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    27. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    28. Referred to the Subcommittee on Civil Service.

    29. Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

    30. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.

    31. Referred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    32. Referred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    33. Referred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    34. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E673)

    35. Introduced in House

    36. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.4404 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.4404 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.4404 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.4404 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources