PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 106-354.
Congressional Research Service
Version 49 · Public Law · Oct 12, 2000
Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000 - Amends title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act to give States the option of making medical assistance for breast and cervical cancer-related treatment services available during a presumptive eligibility period to certain low-income women without creditable coverage who have already been screened for such cancers under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention breast and cervical cancer early detection program, and need treatment. Provides for an enhanced match with regard to such Medicaid treatment services.
People & committees
Rep. Myrick, Sue Wilkins [R-NC-9] · R–NC
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 106-354.
Became Public Law No: 106-354.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by voice vote. (consideration: CR H9847-9852; text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H9847-9848)
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by voice vote.(consideration: CR H9847-9852; text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H9847-9848)
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 628, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on the motion.
Mr. Bilirakis moved that the House agree to the Senate amendment.
Rule H. Res. 628 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 628 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of Sen. amendment with amemdment to H.R. 4386 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate in lieu of S. 662 with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate in lieu of S. 662 with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S. 662 amended.
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S9821-9823)
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 542.
Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 421 - 1 (Roll no. 151). (text: CR H2687-2689)
House roll call 151 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 421 - 1 (Roll no. 151).(text: CR H2687-2689)
House roll call 151 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2735)
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 4386.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2687-2698)
Mr. Lazio moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Referred to the House Committee on Commerce.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.4386 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.4386 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.4386 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.4386 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.