PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 115-170.
Congressional Research Service
Version 82 · Passed Senate without amendment · Apr 23, 2018
Admiral Lloyd R. "Joe" Vasey Pacific War Commemorative Display Establishment Act
(Sec. 4) This bill authorizes the Pacific Historic Parks to establish and maintain a commemorative display to honor the members of the U.S. Armed Forces and Allies who served in the Pacific Theater during World War II. Federal funds may not be used to design, procure, prepare, install, or maintain the commemorative display, but the National Park Service may accept and expend contributions of non-Federal funds and resources for such purposes.
Federal funds may not be used to design, procure, prepare, install, or maintain the commemorative display, but the National Park Service may accept and expend contributions of nonfederal funds and resources for such purposes.
People & committees
Rep. Hanabusa, Colleen [D-HI-1] · D–HI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 115-170.
Became Public Law No: 115-170.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2354)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S2354)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 360.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 115-216.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 115-216.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 115-504.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection. (text: CR H9746)
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.(text: CR H9746)
Mr. Bishop (UT) asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider.
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H9746)
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 332.
Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-450.
Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-450.
Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.4300 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.4300 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.4300 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.4300 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.