PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Judiciary and Education.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 21, 1994
Directs the Attorney General and the District of Columbia (DC) to enter into an agreement under which the Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall assume control over and management of the Lorton Correctional Complex in Virginia. Requires such agreement to include provisions ensuring that: (1) any authority possessed by the DC Department of Corrections on January 1, 1994, to control or manage the Complex is transferred to the Director; (2) the Director has complete control; (3) all employees at the Complex meet Bureau of Prisons standards; and (4) Bureau regulations and policies apply fully to the Complex, guide the determination of which prisoners serve their sentences there, and govern the transfer of prisoners between the Complex and other institutions.
People & committees
Rep. Moran, James P. [D-VA-8] · D–VA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Judiciary and Education.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration.
Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.
Referred to the House Committee on District of Columbia.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 16, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.4293 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.4293 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.4293 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.4293 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.