PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.4239 / 115th Congress

SECURE American Energy Act

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 781.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 3, 2017

Strengthening the Economy with Critical Untapped Resources to Expand American Energy Act or the SECURE American Energy Act

Accessing Strategic Resources Offshore Act or the ASTRO Act

This bill addresses offshore and onshore oil and gas resources on the outer Continental Shelf (OCS) and other federal lands.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

The bill amends the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to establish a revenue sharing framework to distribute revenues collected from oil and gas leasing on the OCS to certain states (Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Alaska). The bill also increases, for FY2029-FY2059, the amount of qualified OCS revenues available for distribution to Gulf producing states (Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas).

The bill limits the President's authority to prohibit oil and gas leasing on the OCS.

Under the bill, the Department of the Interior must conduct wind lease sales on the OCS off the coast of California and Hawaii.

Opportunities for the Nation and States to Harness Onshore Resources for Energy Act or the ONSHORE Act

The bill allows states with an established permitting and regulatory programs to manage certain federal permitting and regulatory responsibilities for oil and gas development on federal lands within their borders. The bill amends the Mineral Leasing Act to provide a mechanism for states to receive their entitled percentage of sales, bonuses, royalties, and rentals for all public land or deposits located in the state.

Interior must defer to state regulations, guidance, and permit requirements for all activities regarding hydraulic fracturing relating to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities on federal land.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Scalise, Steve [R-LA-1] · R–LA

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
16 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 781.

  2. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-1000.

  3. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-1000.

  4. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 19 - 14.

  5. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  6. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  7. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  8. Introduced in House

  9. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.4239 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.4239 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.4239 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.4239 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources