PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.4235 / 103rd Congress

Dairy Producer Market Stabilization and Export Development Act of 1994

Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 14, 1994

Dairy Producer Market Stabilization and Export Development Act of 1994 - Directs the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) to establish the national Class IV Pool (Pool), which shall establish a blend price for milk used in commercially exported dairy products; and (2) the Dairy Export Marketing Board (Board) which shall administer the Pool and work to expand dairy exports and markets. Directs the Board to: (1) establish a settlement fund to operate the Pool; and (2) prepare an annual Pool plan. Amends the Agricultural Act of 1949 to revise excess purchase milk price reduction provisions. Extends: (1) the milk price support program (including the support rate); and (2) the dairy transfer program to the military and veterans' hospitals. Amends the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 to extend Federal milk marketing order authority. Amends Federal law to extend the dairy indemnity program. Amends the Food Security Act of 1985 to extend the dairy export incentive program. Amends the Agricultural Act of 1949 to extend the Secretary's requirement to estimate Commodity Credit Corporation milk and milk products purchases, but stipulates that such estimates be made prior to Pool effects or purchase price revisions are determined. Amends provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, reenacted by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 to include certain milk handler reimbursement provisions among the terms of Federal milk marketing orders.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Volkmer, Harold L. [D-MO-9] · D–MO

Committees

  • Agriculture Committee
10 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  2. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  3. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  4. Executive Comment Requested from USDA.

  5. Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock.

  6. Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

  7. Introduced in House

  8. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.4235 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.4235 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.4235 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.4235 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources